People v. Ramsey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
The defendant was convicted of burglary, and appeals from the judgment. He does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence but contends the prosecuting attorney committed prejudicial misconduct in argument to the jury; that the prosecuting attorney attempted to impeach the defendant by reference to prior convictions which it is claimed were mere misdemeanors and not felonies, and that there was an error in an instruction given by the court to the jury.
The facts may be briefly summarized as follows: Sel’s Restaurant, in Salinas, had closed for the Christmas holidays, December 24, 25 and 26,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. McCrackenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re HarincarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. HathcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. AtwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.