Legal Opinion

Ex parte Liedel

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 31, 1988No. Civ. 6369PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAM, Judge.

Elizabeth and Ronald Liedel are the mother and stepfather of Charles Sullivan, an eleven-year-old child who is the subject of a petition for declaration of dependency *625filed by the Madison County Department of Human Resources (department). After a hearing on the petition, the trial judge issued an order which vested temporary legal custody of the child in the department, directed the family to obtain psychological counseling, and taxed certain costs against the stepfather. The case is before this court on a petition for writ of mandamus filed by the stepfather, who seeks to have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ex Parte RudolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Ex Parte AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Humane Soc. of Marshall County v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ronald Liedel and Elizabeth Liedel v. The Juvenile Court of Madison County, Alabama, and the Alabama Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Liedel v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API