Legal Opinion
Ronald Liedel and Elizabeth Liedel v. The Juvenile Court of Madison County, Alabama, and the Alabama Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 16, 1990No. 89-7235PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:
This case arises on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ section 1983 complaint on February 14, 1989, and the court’s denial of their March 2, 1989, Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate Judgment. 707 F.Supp. 486. We affirm.
I. FACTS
In their complaint, Ronald and Elizabeth Liedel (“the Liedels”) alleged that the Madison County, Alabama Department of Human Resources (“the Department”) and the Juvenile Court of Madison County, Alabama (“the Juvenile Court”), violated the Liedels’ constitutional rights to due process and privacy. The Liedels…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Paul E. Bettencourt, M.D. v. Board of Registration in Medicine of the Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Goodman Ex Rel. Goodman v. SiposCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- T.W. And M.W., Minors, by Their Next Friend, Scott Enk v. Thomas BrophyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Narey v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Powell v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.