Arden v. United Artisans
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McBRIDE, J.-
The principal question argued by defendant is as to the sufficiency of the proof of death of Thomas A. Arden. On behalf of plaintiff, there was substantial testimony that Arden was a cook and hotel worker by occupation, which it appears was interspersed by ventures in mining; that after their marriage they lived at various places and plaintiff’s husband pursued the business of his vocation, cooking in restaurants and other business of that character; that after having obtained this insurance, which was while he resided in Portland, he and his family went to Astoria; that in 1898…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Steen v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Cobble v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Rosenstein v. Court of HonorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kankkonen v. HENDRICKSONOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Ballinger v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Fink v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- Hefford v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.