Legal Opinion

Slocum v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 7, 1923PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.

This is an action of contract on a policy of life insurance issued by the defendant to the plaintiff’s intestate, Lillian E. Miller. On November 26, 1920, she was shot and killed by her husband, Charles Miller, who at that time was the beneficiary named in the policy. The only question raised by the defendant is whether said administrator is entitled to the proceeds of the policy, the insured having died leaving no issue.

*567Admittedly Charles Miller would be debarred from acquiring the proceeds if he should bring an action in his own name under G. L. c. 175, § 125. It would be contrary to public…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Perry v. StrawbridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Schmidt v. Northern Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Gaudette v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Kravitz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Garwols v. Bankers Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Wheeler v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Illinois Bankers Life Ass'n v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API