Legal Opinion
Packers Trading Company v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 29, 1992No. 91-3107PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge.
In defending its opinion and order entered in a reparation proceeding 1 against Respondent’s Petition for Review, the Respondent Commodity Futures Trading Commission reminds this court that “the agency’s determinations are entitled to a special deference by the reviewing court.” Central Nat’l Bank of Mattoon v. U.S. Dept. of Treasury, 912 F.2d 897, 904-05 (7th Cir.1990). That is the way it ordinarily should be, but when the Commission asks this court to approve its reparation award in the amount of $14,250 in favor of a confirmed commodities…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Washington Capitols Basketball Club, Inc. v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- McCracken v. Olson Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Central National Bank of Mattoon v. United States Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Young v. Verizon's Bell Atlantic Cash Balance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Peter Scheiber v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc., and Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- In Re Aimster Copyright LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Young v. Verizon's Bell Atlantic Cash Balance PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.