Legal Opinion

Fisher v. City of Bartlett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1934No. 8160PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, Chief Justice.

Appeal from an interlocutory order denying to appellants (Mrs. Fisher, plaintiff below, and Cates, intervener below, taxpaying citizens of the city of Bartlett) a temporary injunction restraining the city, its officials and others, from performing a contract and disposing of bonds issued thereunder, whereby there was then being erected for the city a municipal electric light plant under the provisions of R. S. art. 1111 et seq.; the bonds to be secured by a mortgage upon the plant and the revenues thereof. The city had advertised for bids under the “Bond and Warrant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. W.D. Yett, Mayor v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. City of San Antonio v. StrumbergTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. City of Dayton v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Polly v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Tyrrell & Garth Inv. Co. v. City of HighlandsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. San Antonio Conservation Soc. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Smith v. Wald Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. City of Corpus Christi Ex Rel. Harris v. FlatoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Hazelwood v. City of CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Powell v. City of BairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API