In Re Mann

THE COURT.

This is the second application of the petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus. The first application was refused (In re Mann, ante, p. 165 [219 Pac. 71]), but he has renewed his application by showing, in addition to facts heretofore stated, that the state board of prison directors by a formal resolution have already granted him sufficient credits to require his discharge if the two sentences imposed upon him by the trial court of five years each run concurrently instead of consecutively.

Upon the previous application we held that the state board of prison directors had no power to…