Legal Opinion

Ex parte Kirby

California Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1888No. 20434PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

The wardenof the state prison at Folsom, Charles Aull, made the following return to the writ herein:—

“In the supreme court of the state of California.
“In the matter of the application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of James Kenan Kirby.
“To the honorable the supreme court of the state of California:—
“ State of California, } f I pe County of Sacramento,)
“I, Charles Aull, warden of the California state prison at Folsom, do hereby certify that I received the annexed writ of habeas corpus on the twenty-fourth day of May, A. D. 1888, and, in obedience to commands of same, I make return as…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. . HookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. In Re PedriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re MannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. In Re WignallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API