Legal Opinion

Atac v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 13, 2013No. 4D10-3024PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCiklin, J.

In this appeal, we address an issue of first impression in Florida: whether Miranda 1 warnings are required before law enforcement officials may engage in certain interactions with a “barricaded person” during a standoff. In appealing his manslaughter conviction, Erin Atac raises multiple issues, one of which warrants discussion. Atac argues that the police were required to administer Miranda warnings before questioning him over the telephone after Atac barricaded himself in his apartment and threatened to kill himself and anyone who entered the apartment. We join the consensus of states that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. StallworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Saldivar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KirerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. State of Missouri v. Jeffrey ReuterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. State v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API