Legal Opinion

Fink v. City of Highland Park

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1969No. Docket No. 6,103Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.

The Court is asked here to apply to a public utility the so-called “2-inch rule”1 which heretofore applied only to municipal corporations. This Court has held in the past, under CLS 1961 § 242.1 (Stat Ann 1958 Rev § 9.591), 2 * that a person cannot, as a matter of law, recover from a municipal corporation for injuries received because of a defect of less than two inches in a city sidewalk.

Plaintiff was injured on August 24, 1964, when he tripped over a 6-inch by 6-inch metal cover plate *174with the word “gas” inscribed thereon, which was located in a public sidewalk in Highland Park. Permission…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parker v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  2. Harris v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bigelow v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Berry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. City of Colorado Springs v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API