Legal Opinion

Loew Filter Co. v. German-American Filter Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1908No. 1,767PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

LURTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a bill to restrain infringement of patent No. 378,379, granted February 21, 1888, to Simon and Frederick Uhlman, assignees of Heinrich Stockheim, inventor of a certain “new and useful filtering process for beer.” The defenses are that the process had been anticipated and had not been infringed. The Circuit Court found the patent valid and infringed. In a number of prior litigations with other alleged infringers the validity of Stock-heim’s patent has been sustained against evidence of alleged anticipatory uses or publications. Uhlman et al. v. Bartholomae &…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. KalleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  4. Loew Filter Co. v. German-American Filter Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  5. Uhlman v. Arnholdt & Schaefer Brewing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fleischman Yeast Co. v. Federal Yeast CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1925
  2. Maibohm v. RCA Victor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  3. Scovill Mfg. Co. v. SatlerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
  4. Standard Brands v. Federal Yeast CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1930
  5. Baldwin-Southwark Corp. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API