Legal Opinion

Capuano v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 15, 1986No. 1 CA-IC 3397PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The issue in this special action review concerns the res judicata effect of two unprotested notices of supportive care on a subsequent determination that claimant’s industrial injury caused his psychiatric condition. We conclude the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable to supportive care awards.

Claimant sustained a work-related back injury on September 7, 1979. After one year of conservative treatment, his continuing complaints led his treating physician to seek consultations with a neurologist and psychiatrist. Based upon a diagnosis of depression both…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Company v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  2. Arellano v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Noble v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Bergstresser v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Tsosie v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Bank One Corp. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Jones v. daisy/copperpointCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  5. Sambrano v. Kr CapitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API