Capuano v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
The issue in this special action review concerns the res judicata effect of two unprotested notices of supportive care on a subsequent determination that claimant’s industrial injury caused his psychiatric condition. We conclude the doctrine of res judicata is inapplicable to supportive care awards.
Claimant sustained a work-related back injury on September 7, 1979. After one year of conservative treatment, his continuing complaints led his treating physician to seek consultations with a neurologist and psychiatrist. Based upon a diagnosis of depression both…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Home Insurance Company v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Arellano v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Noble v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Bergstresser v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Tsosie v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Bank One Corp. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Jones v. daisy/copperpointCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Sambrano v. Kr CapitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.