Legal Opinion

Green v. Delaware, L. & W. R.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 10, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Law. Action by Lillian M. Green against the Delaware,- Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company. On motion to relieve plaintiff from filing a bill of particulars.

1Opinion of the Court

RELLSTAB, District Judge.

The action is founded on negligence. The plaintiff having filed her declaration, the defendant demanded a bill of particulars, specifying 19 different matters in regard to which additional information was desired. The plaintiff thereupon moved to be relieved from answering such demand. At the argument, 6 of these specifications were withdrawn. The remaining 13 are as follows:

“(1) What was the date of your alleged injury?”
“(4) When you boarded the defendant’s train, what did the plaintiff do?”
“(8) State particularly just how you were injured.

‘•(9) Was the sole cause of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Camden & Suburban Railway Co. v. StetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Hanks Dental Assn. v. International Tooth Crown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Watkins v. CopeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  4. Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
  5. Wilson v. New England Navigation Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. A. Bentley & Sons Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1923
  2. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York v. SaylesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1927
  3. Alaska S. S. Co. v. KatzeekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  4. Pringle v. StorrowDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1925
  5. Bodine v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API