Legal Opinion
Vernon Solomon v. Interior Regional Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 20, 2002No. 01-35766PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge.
Title 25 U.S.C. § 450e(b) provides that “[a]ny contract, subcontract, grant, or sub-grant pursuant to [an act] authorizing Federal contracts with or grants to Indian organizations or for the benefit of Indians, shall require that to the greatest extent feasible,” preference shall be given to Indians in the employment and training opportunities connected with the grant. This appeal requires us to decide whether that statute creates a private right of action for a Native Alaskan who applied unsuccessfully for a job with a Native Alaskan regional housing authority. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nisqually Indian Tribe v. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Timmy CliattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Solomon v. Interior Regional Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- ECHE v. HolderDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.