Legal Opinion
Harold Frankel v. Bally, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 17, 1993No. 813, Docket 92-7861PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Harold Frankel appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Pierre N. Leval, Judge) dismissing his complaint in its entirety following the grant of summary judgment for defendant-appellee Bally, Inc. (“Bally”). Frankel, who worked for Bally as a shoe sales representative, had filed a complaint alleging, inter alia, that his termination by Bally was improperly based on age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1), New York…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Robinson v. Overseas Military Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Barfield v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Irizarry v. CatsimatidisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Dejesus v. HF Management Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.