Legal Opinion
Quinault Indian Nation v. Imperium Terminal Services, LLC
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 2017No. 92552-6PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 Two companies applied for permits to expand their oil terminals on the shores of Grays Harbor. The expansion would facilitate the storage of additional fuel products, which would arrive by train or truck and depart by ocean-bound ship. The issue here is whether the Ocean Resources Management Act (ORMA), chapter 43.143 RCW, *464applies to these expansion projects.1 The Shoreline Hearings Board (Board) and the Court of Appeals held that ORMA does not apply to these projects based on limited definitions in the Department of Ecology’s (DOE) ORMA implementation regulations. We hold that this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Kitsap County v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Kitsap County v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Solvay Chemicals, Inc., V State Of Wa Dept. Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Ass'n of Wash. Bus. v. Dep't of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- Boyer Towing, Inc. v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026
- Certification From the U.S. Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Wash. in Mariano Carranza v. Dovex Fruit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
- Certification From the U.S. Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Wash. in Mariano Carranza v. Dovex Fruit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.