Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1904No. 5,074PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Marion Criminal Court (33,336); Fremont Alford, Judge. ( James A. Russell and another were convicted of maintaining a nuisance, and appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

This action was commenced hy the State of Indiana against appellants, upon the affidavit of one August ILaug, for erecting and maintaining a common nuisance, under §2154 Burns 1901, §2066 Horner 1901. The cause was first tried before a justice of the peace. Erom the justice’s court an appeal was taken to the Marion Criminal Court, in which court appellants were found guilty, and fined $10 and costs.

Appellants separately assign errors — Mary, that the affidavit does not state facts sufficient to constitute, a cause of action against her; James, that it does not state facts sufficient to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. BinghamOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Guest v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Metzger v. HochreinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Keiper v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Stein v. HauckIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Giller v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Wolf v. ForcumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Keefer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API