Legal Opinion
Wolf v. Forcum
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 28, 1959No. 18,995PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBierly, J.
Appellants complained of the appellees by filing a complaint in two paragraphs. Omitting the formal parts thereof, the complaint in formal substance alleged as follows:
“No. C-602B — FIRST PARAGRAPH OF COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR NUISANCE
“Plaintiffs complain of the defendants, and each of them, and for cause of action, allege:
“1. That plaintiffs are the owners of real estate at what is commonly known as 2024 West Pennsylvania Street, Evansville, Indiana. That there is a dwelling house upon said property.
“2. That sometime during the month of July, 1955, the defendant Purdie Forcum, then the owner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- WALKER v. EllisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
- Keiper v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Schmoe v. CottonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Giller v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- State ex rel. Flannigan v. PalmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Saurer v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. TishnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Collinson v. John L. Scott, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Boyle v. Kosciusko CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Jennifer Mustoe v. Xiaoye Ma And Anthony JordanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.