Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Leeman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 18, 1933No. 20478, 20479PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Woods county. Two cases, Nos. 29478 and 20479, arc-involved herein. They are both appeals from the same case in the trial court, but herein consolidated in this court. The case-ma'des are identical. The reason for the two ap peals arises out of the following situation: The cause was tried in December of 1928. A motion for new trial was filed and overruled, during the same month and the same term. Thereafter, and in the succeeding term, a petition for new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence was tiled. A hearing was had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Bank of Chelsea v. School Dist. No. 1, Rogers Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Ben Cooper Motor Co. v. AmeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Brownell v. BurkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leveridge v. NotarasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Cherry v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Pauls Valley Milling Co. v. GabbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Inter-Ocean Oil Co. v. MarhsallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Clements v. McConnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API