Legal Opinion

Close Bros. & Co. v. City of Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 6, 1920No. 8912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Edw. D. Oldfield, Judge. Action by Close Brothers & Company against the city of Oklahoma City to compel levy and certification to the county treasurer of one year’s additional interest on certain paving certificates issued by the officials of Oklahoma City in payment of the contract for certain paving within the. limits of said city. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, C. J.

This is an action for mandamus to compel the city authorities to levy and certify to the county treasurer one year's interest on certain paving certificates held by plaintiff. It is alleged that the paving certificates were issued at various times from October 26, 1905, to December 8, 1915, bearing interest from date, and that no levy and certification to the county clerk was made until the year 1906, and no payments were made to the plaintiff upon said paving certificates until during the year 1907. It appears the certificates were paid, together with ten years’ interest, but it is alleged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Guthrie v. Stewart, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bath v. DumasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Braine v. City of StroudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Board of Com'rs of Carter County v. WortenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Jones v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Sneed v. TippettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API