Legal Opinion

Hageman v. Vander Vorste

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1987No. 15297, 15320PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Retired Justice.

The trial court determined that plaintiff (appellant) was entitled to recover $9,333.03 from defendant, as a result of their purchase and sale of livestock as partners or joint venturers. The trial court also awarded costs but refused to award appellant prejudgment interest on his recovery and he appeals. We reverse.

From 1976 to 1978 the parties were involved in numerous “cattle deals” in which they bought and resold cattle together. Defendant’s wife did the bookkeeping for them. In 1979 the parties attempted to have an accountant audit their transactions. This audit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arcon Construction Co. v. South Dakota Cement PlantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hepper v. Triple U Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Beka v. Lithium Corporation of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Chesapeake Industries, Inc. v. Togova Entreprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Hanson v. Funk Seeds InternationalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clements v. GabrielSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Clements v. GabrielSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hageman v. Vander VorsteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Heer v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Heer v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API