Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of C.R.B.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 1986No. C5-85-1616PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Carlton Brastad appeals from a trial court order vacating an order terminating Kim Wood’s parental rights to their daughter, C.R.B. Brastad contends that Wood’s motion to vacate the termination order was not timely under Minn.R.Civ.P. 60.02, that the trial court’s finding of fraud was clearly erroneous and that reinstating Wood’s parental rights is not in the best interests of C.R.B. We affirm.

FACTS

Brastad and Wood were divorced in December 1980. The dissolution decree contained no reference to a child of the marriage. C.R.B. lived with Wood after the dissolution.

Several…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Halloran v. BLUE AND WHITE LIBERTY CAB CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Marriage of Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Petition of MGCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.A.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. In re the Welfare of J.T.L.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Marriage of Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Welfare of R.L.M. v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API