Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marriage of Clay v. Clay

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1986No. C1-86-1056, C3-86-1057Published

1DissentRandall, Judge

I concur in the holding of the majority that appellant is not entitled to indemnity or contribution for child support, and I agree that respondent is not entitled to recover attorney fees.

I respectfully dissent on the issue of the summary judgment granted to respondents under Minn.Stat. § 548.14 (1984). I would reverse and remand to the trial court with instructions to appoint a guardian ad litem for T.C., and allow appellant to develop with evidence and litigate on the merits, not of vacation of the dissolution judgment. Minn.Stat. § 548.14 (1984). I find that there is a genuine and material…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Halloran v. BLUE AND WHITE LIBERTY CAB CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. In Re the Welfare of C.R.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API