Legal Opinion

Marriage of Thomas v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1984No. C7-84-862PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

This appeal is taken from an order dated April 11, 1984, which modified the judgment and decree issued in a dissolution between the parties and denied husband’s motion for a new trial, based on fraud in the procurement of the stipulation. We affirm.

FACTS

The original divorce decree between the parties, ending a ten-year marriage, was entered February 4, 1983, pursuant to a stipulation. Husband was not represented by counsel, having waived that right.

Wife was awarded custody of their two minor children, and husband was ordered to make monthly support payments of $250.00…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kerr v. KerrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Williams v. GrossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bredemann v. BredemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Berg v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Goar v. GoarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. In Re the Welfare of C.R.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Angelos v. AngelosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Schroetke v. SchroetkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Marriage of Saabye v. SaabyeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API