Legal Opinion
Teamsters Local 312 v. Matlack, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1996No. Civil Action 95-5661PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
This is an action by Teamsters Local 312 (“Union”), pursuant to § 301(c) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(c), to enforce an arbitration award made under a collective bargaining agreement. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
The grievance in issue, filed by the Union, alleged that defendant Matlaek, Inc. (“Mat-lack”) had improperly transferred “waste water shipments” to its non-union Elkton, Maryland terminal for handling. These waste water loads were described as originating “in Muscatine, Iowa or other parts of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- La Vale Plaza, Inc., a New York Corporation v. R. S. Noonan, Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, Local 35 v. The Washington Post CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Teamsters Local 312 v. Matlack, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. NL IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Roy Martel v. Ensco Offshore CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Teamsters Local 312 v. Matlack IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997