Robertson v. Village of Grand Rapids
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Itasca county to recover a balance of $2,400 claimed.to be due upon a contract for the installation of an electric light plant in defendant village. The case was tried before McClenahan, J., who directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
June 14, 1902, defendant advertised for bids for an electric light plant, calling for sealed proposals, according to specifications and plans to be furnished by defendant. The instructions accompanying the plans and specifications stated that all proposals must be carefully and completely made on the printed forms annexed, and would be received for the following work: Building, machinery, and electric lines, and for one or more of such parts, preference to be given those for the entire work. The specifications provided that Edward P. Burch, of Minneapolis, was the consulting engineer, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Willson v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Taylor v. Times Newspaper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Carter v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Womack v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.