Womack v. Coleman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover from defendants,-H. H. Coleman and C. E. Lindberg, maker and indorser respectively, the sum of $15,000 and interest, upon a promissory note. The case was tried before Pond, J., who found in favor of defendants. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The parties to this action on March 27, 1901, entered into a written contract which recited that appellant held an option for the purchase of certain mineral lands in the state of Michigan, consisting of about eight hundred forty acres and respondent Coleman agreed to pay appellant, as and for the purchase price thereof, the sum of $145,000, as follows:
“At the signing of this contract, said second party’s certain promissory note for fifteen thousand dollars, with an indorser thereon, duly accepted by said party of the first part, due and payable April 5th, 1901; said note to be placed in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Taylor v. Times Newspaper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Carter v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weatherford v. AdamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Womack v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- McGuckin v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Chapman v. ProppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. FronkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.