Carter v. Strom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Bamsey county, Baxter, J., presiding, (before whom, acting for a judge-of the second district, the action was tried, without a jury,) refusing, a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The plaintiff and defendant executed an agreement in writing for the exchange of lands. The plaintiff was to pay to the-defendant $225 upon the exchange of deeds. The lands to be exchanged were incumbered, and each party agreed to assume and pay the incumbrance upon the lands to be by him received in exchange. The defendant also agreed to make, within a specified time, certain specified improvements in the buildings upon the land which he was-to convey, and to “assign the insurance.” Each party was to furnish to the other an abstract of title. The agreement contained the further provision…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lyman v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Lampman v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Daily v. LitchfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Trower v. ElderIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Hamilton v. OvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Condon v. KemperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Alvord v. BanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Merica v. BurgetIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Goodell v. Accumulative Income Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Wilhelm v. EavesOregon Supreme Court · 1891
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.