Legal Opinion

State v. Lizotte

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 19, 1987No. 4568PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction rendered pursuant to a plea of nolo contendere on the charge of possession of narcotics, a violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a). His plea of nolo contendere was conditional upon his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress certain evidence seized from his van without a warrant. See General Statutes § 54-94a.1 He claims that the trial court erred (1) in finding that the police officers had probable cause to stop the defendant’s motor *13vehicle, (2) in finding that the police officers’ warrant-less…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. State v. JeffreysConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. State v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API