Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Cuellar

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 28, 1964No. FILE Nos. 15598, 15599, 15600PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.

The three named defendants, in accordance with the provisions of Public Acts 1963, No. 652, §§ 1-8 (General Statutes §§ 54-33a—54-33g) “An Act concerning Searches and Seizures,” have filed similar motions to suppress for use as evidence .against them certain, “tangible things” seized by Greenwich police officers as a result of what is claimed to .have been unreasonable search in violation of their rights under article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution, the fourth and fourteenth amendments to the United States constitution, and .said Public. Act No. 652. More specifically, it is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PierceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. de Jesús RoblesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965
  4. Grundstrom v. BetoDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
  5. United States v. HerbergUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API