Thompson v. Hank's of Carolina, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred by dismissing their claims pursuant to G.S. § 1-109. Specifically, plaintiffs argue that the trial court lacked authority to dismiss their actions pursuant to G.S. § 1-109 and that dismissal was an inappropriate sanction.
G.S. § 1-109 allows a defendant in a civil action or special proceeding to seek a $200.00 prosecution bond. It also provides, *91in pertinent part, that “failure to comply with such order within 30 days from the date thereof shall constitute grounds for dismissal of such civil action or special proceeding[.]”
In Narron v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sam ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Daniels v. Montgomery Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Narron v. Union Camp Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Rivenbark v. Southmark Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Sanford v. Starlite Disco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goss v. BattleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Goss v. BattleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993