Cuevas v. Derosa
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioner seeks leave to file a second or successive habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. As the ground for the present petition, petitioner relies on the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004).
Under the relevant gatekeeping provision, a new rule of law can form the basis for a second or successive habeas petition only if that rule is “made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255, para. 8(2). To date, the Supreme Court has not decided whether Blakely is even…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sustache-Rivera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- In re: Will C. Dean, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- William S. Simpson, Applicant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. AgramonteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Loher v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008
- United States v. RamirezDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- United States v. StancellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- State v. Dille, 2006-Ca-10 (7-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.