Legal Opinion

Cuevas v. Derosa

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 22, 2004No. 04-2066PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks leave to file a second or successive habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. As the ground for the present petition, petitioner relies on the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004).

Under the relevant gatekeeping provision, a new rule of law can form the basis for a second or successive habeas petition only if that rule is “made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255, para. 8(2). To date, the Supreme Court has not decided whether Blakely is even…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Sustache-Rivera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. In re: Will C. Dean, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. William S. Simpson, Applicant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. AgramonteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  2. Loher v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. United States v. RamirezDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  4. United States v. StancellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  5. State v. Dille, 2006-Ca-10 (7-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API