Legal Opinion
Peduto v. City of North Wildwood
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 7, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-2914(SSB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge:
Presently before the court is the motion of defendant City of North Wildwood (“North Wildwood” or “the City”) to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint on res judicata grounds or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on the merits. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the court will dismiss the complaint on res judicata grounds.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
In August 1985 North Wildwood imposed a sewer moratorium and construction ban based on a directive from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Plaintiffs John M. Peduto and El-Ro, Inc., were owners and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John M. Peduto and El-Ro, Inc. v. City of North WildwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Heir v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Delaware Valley Transplant Program v. CoyeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Abbiss v. Delaware Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- W.J.F. Realty Corp. v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002