Legal Opinion

John M. Peduto and El-Ro, Inc. v. City of North Wildwood

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 1989No. 88-5809PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

This case arises from a claim by appellants John M. Peduto and El-Ro, Inc. that a temporary sewer moratorium and construction ban imposed by the City of North Wildwood, New Jersey constituted a com-pensable taking of their property. The district court dismissed appellants’ complaint on res judicata grounds, holding that the New Jersey state court had already adjudicated appellants’ federal claims. The primary issue in this appeal is whether applying New Jersey claim preclusion rules violates appellants’ due process rights. Since New Jersey’s inverse…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Rycoline Products, Inc. v. C & W UnlimitedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Palomar Mobilehome Park Association v. City of San MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Hickerson v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. William Morgan v. Covington TwpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API