Legal Opinion

McVeagh v. Bass

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1933No. Appeal 298PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The opinion of the learned court below, filed pursuant to Rule 58, fully justifies its action in entering judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto. If, as may be possible, the plaintiff, and her daughter testifying on her behalf, exaggerated the darkness in the defendant’s store, she must accept the consequences necessarily resulting from that testimony. ■

The judgment is affirmed on the. opinion of the court below.

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Just v. Sons of Italy HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Bartek v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API