McVeagh v. Bass
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The opinion of the learned court below, filed pursuant to Rule 58, fully justifies its action in entering judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto. If, as may be possible, the plaintiff, and her daughter testifying on her behalf, exaggerated the darkness in the defendant’s store, she must accept the consequences necessarily resulting from that testimony. ■
The judgment is affirmed on the. opinion of the court below.
2Cited by18 opinions
- Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Just v. Sons of Italy HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Bartek v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.