Legal Opinion

Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. Nee

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided October 3, 1935No. 2725, 2730, 2733, 2734, 2738, 2739, 2741-2752, 2754, 2755, 2762, 2765, 2766, 2771PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s bill in each of these cases alleges that the plaintiff is subject to the processing tax provided for in the Agricultural Adjustment Act (48 Stat. 31, as amended, title 7, U. S. C. § 601 et seq.); that demand has been made by the defendant that it pay the tax; that the provision for the tax in the act is invalid because beyond the constitutional authority of the Congress. The bill prays that the defendant be enjoined from collecting the tax from the plaintiff. It prays also a declaratory judgment that the processing tax provision in' the act is unconstitutional.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Lee v. BoswellDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1971
  3. Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization, Department of Revenue & TaxationWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1945
  5. In re Royal-Wilhelm Furniture Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API