Legal Opinion

Perma-Stone Corp. v. Merkel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1949PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

On this appeal it suffices to note the following. The contract for the Veritone Perma shingles, which were to be used by plaintiff to re-cover defendants’ residence under the contract between the parties, was subject to the Federal Emergency Price Control Act and the federal regulations made thereunder as to the ceiling price and other matters by the federal Office of Price Administration. In defendants’ answer they alleged as special defenses in connection with other matters of defense,—

“1. That the plaintiff misrepresented the prevailing cost of work and material on this job and thereby…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Menominee River Boom Co. v. Augustus Spies Lumber & Cedar Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. A. B. Lewis Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Beat v. MickelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. DIPPEL v. BrunozziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Vic Hansen & Sons, Inc. v. CrowleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Baierl v. McTaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bromberg v. MoulCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  5. Moonlight v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API