Legal Opinion
Bromberg v. Moul
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 7, 1960No. 92, Docket 25704PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Chief Judge.
This is a diversity action for the price of two used machine tools and the expenses incurred by the plaintiff in their repair, shipment, and storage, based on an alleged contract between the parties. On or about December 28, 1951, the defendant is alleged to have agreed to purchase one “Diamond grinder” and two “Bridgeport grinders” for $12,500, but it is claimed that he paid for, and accepted delivery of, only the “Diamond grinder.” Plaintiff stated in a pre-trial deposition that separate prices had been established for each tool: $4,250 for the “Diamond grinder,” $4,250…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Raines v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Application of Pioneer Mill CompanyHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- United States v. Herman RaddatzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Dressler v. The Mv SandpiperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.