Legal Opinion

Cliffcorn Answering Service, Inc. v. Deutschel

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.

Plaintiff, a telephone answering service, moves for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from using the name of “ Cliffcorn ” in connection with defendant’s telephone answering service business, and from soliciting, canvassing or advertising for customers who are now serviced by the plaintiff. Plaintiff also asks that defendant be restrained from furnishing to anyone the names and addresses of plaintiff’s customers, and directing defendant to remove the said name “ Cliffcorn ” from stationery, advertising and other business papers, and from otherwise continuing in acts of unfair…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Admiral Corp. v. Penco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. Glen & Hall Manufacturing Co. v. HallCommission of Appeals · 1874
  5. Von Bremen v. . MacMonniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. David B. Findlay, Inc. v. FindlayNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API