Legal Opinion
David B. Findlay, Inc. v. Findlay
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEmilio Nunez, J.
Plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from using the name “Findlay Galleries”, “Wally Findlay Galleries ’ ’ or any other designation incorporating the name ‘ ‘ Find-lay ” in connection with the operation of an art gallery at premises 17 East 57th Street, New York City.
Plaintiff David B. Findlay and defendant Walstein G. Findlay are brothers. I will refer to them as “ David ” and “ Wally ”. David, operating either individually or through various corporate names has conducted a fine arts business on East 57th Street or its vicinity continuously for more than 25 years. He has used the names “…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- David B. Findlay, Inc. v. FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Explorers Club, Inc. v. Diageo plcNew York Supreme Court · 2014