Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Rosner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 11, 1993No. 91 Civ. 3099 (PKL)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This is a diversity action in negligence arising out of injuries allegedly caused by a rear-end collision on September 5, 1988, at the intersection of Second Avenue and Saint Mark’s Place in the borough of Manhattan in New York City, New York. Plaintiffs Leticia Ortiz (“Ortiz”) and Jesse Guevara (“Guevara”) have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Ortiz is a resident of Massachusetts who was visiting New York City on September…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Percy King and George Russell v. Crossland Savings Bank and American Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Bale v. NastasiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Ascher v. Target Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Cartin v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Spencer v. CohenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.