Legal Opinion

Eastern Motor Sales Corp. v. Apperson-Lee Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 10, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court, Part II, of the city of Richmond, in a proceeding by motion for a judgment. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

This action was brought by the Apperson-Lee Motor Co., Inc., against the Eastern Motor Sales Corporation to recover of the defendant “commissions on sale of one Aleo Motor Truck to Montrose Fruit Company, Lynchburg, Virginia, at the price of $2,950.00 @ 15%—$442.50,” and at the trial of the cause a judgment was rendered upon the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $376.12, with interest and costs, to which judgment this writ of error was allowed the defendant.

*497It appears that the plaintiff in error was the general agent of the American Locomotive Company for the sale…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paschall & Gresham v. GillissSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  2. Bankers Loan & Investment Co. v. SpindleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. SpatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  2. City of Richmond v. McCormackSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  3. Sutherland v. WamplerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  4. Broad Street Bank v. Baker Motor Vehicle Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  5. Watson v. Oregon Moline Plow Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API