Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Wampler

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 11, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Dickenson county in an action of covenant. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiffs assign error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This action of covenant was brought by J. E. L. and W. T. Sutherland, owners of a saw mill, to recover of C. A. Wampler $800, damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the defendant’s breach of a contract to saw into lumber certain timber trees owned by him. To a judgment for the defendant this writ of error was granted.

It is plain from the evidence that the contracting parties were extremely lax in their business methods, and that the stipulations of the contract were not rigidly insisted on and were performed in a slovenly, loose way on both sides. It was aptly characterized in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ratcliffe v. WalkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. SnowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  3. Eastern Motor Sales Corp. v. Apperson-Lee Motor Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. PerdueSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  5. Wygal v. WilderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Powell v. OrphanageSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  2. City of Richmond v. McCormackSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  3. Ewell v. BrockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  4. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. Ely v. GraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API