Legal Opinion
City of Laredo v. Almazan
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided August 31, 2005No. 04-04-00689-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice.
The City of Laredo, the Laredo Police Chief, and Daniel Migura, Edward Sherwood, and Joaquin Romero, Jr., individually and as members of the Fire Fighters’ and Police Officers’ Civil Service Commission of Laredo appeal the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of police officer Jorge A. Almazan. We hold the requirement in section 143.052(d) of the Texas Local Government Code that a written statement of suspension advise the suspended officer that he has ten days in which to file an appeal is mandatory but not jurisdictional; and section 143.052(c)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Proctor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Danish Mahmood Shaikh, Licensee, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- City of Seabrook v. Port of Houston Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- City of Seabrook v. Port of Houston Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Layne Stanford v. City of Lubbock and Lubbock Fire Fighter and Police Officer Civil Service Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
- Layne Stanford v. City of Lubbock and Lubbock Fire Fighter and Police Officer Civil Service Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.