Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Seabrook v. Port of Houston Authority

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 18, 2006No. 01-04-00925-CVPublished

1DissentEvelyn V. Keyes, J.

I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the order denying the plea to the jurisdiction of appellant, the City of Seabrook (“the City”), and render judgment that the City’s jurisdictional plea be granted and that the underlying condemnation proceedings brought by the Port of Houston Authority (“the Port”) against American Acryl NA, L.L.C. and American Acryl L.P. (together, “American”) be dismissed.

Construction of Water Code in Section 62.106(d)

A. The Issue

This case turns on whether a navigation district’s compliance with Water Code section 62.106(d)1 — which provides that “[n]o right of way…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API