Legal Opinion

In Re the Guardianship of Autio

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 22, 2008No. A07-0595PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant challenges the order denying his petition for appointment as emergency guardian and establishing a public guardianship for his brother. Appellant claims that there is an appropriate, less-restrictive alternative to a public guardianship and that a family member is available to serve as guardian. Respondent disagrees and contends that appellant’s challenge is untimely. Because appellant’s appeal was timely and the district court did not abuse its discretion by establishing public guardianship for appellant’s brother, we affirm.

FACT

Appellant Scot Autio is the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of DahmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. In Re Guardianship of OverpeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. In Re Guardianship of the Estate & Person of SchoberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Hartmann v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. In Re Guardianship of StangerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of the Guardianship of Yuk Lan Moylan, Ward, Richard E. Moylan v. Lina Lelialoha Moylan AlstonSupreme Court of Guam · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API