Legal Opinion
Kozina v. Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 27, 1984No. 84 C 6835PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOCORAS, District Judge:
This matter comes before the court on the defendant Baltimore and Ohio Terminal Railroad’s motion to dismiss plaintiff Kozina’s complaint because this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s action. For the following reasons, the defendant’s motion is granted.
Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the action arises under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. Defendant employed plaintiff from 1969 until August 1983. During his employment, plaintiff was a member of the United Transportation Union (UTU). Plaintiff suffers…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Daniel K. Graf v. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company, and Brotherhood of Railway Carmen, Local No. 882Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- James R. Dorsey v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gregory v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Ince v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Said v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016