Legal Opinion
Ince v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1988No. 85 Civ. 4883 (CBM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Rodger (spelled in all captions as “Roger”) Ince (“Ince”) brings suit against the above-captioned defendants under the Railway Labor Act, 49 U.S.C. §§ 151-163, 181-188 (1982), claiming wrongful discharge by the railroad (“Amtrak”), violation of the duty of fair representation by the union (“Local 102”), and conspiracy by both defendants. Both defendants move for summary judgment.
FACTS
Ince was hired by Amtrak as a trackman on June 16, 1983. His employment in this position was governed by a collective bargaining agreement between Amtrak and the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vera Young v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Caputo v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Musto v. Transport Workers Union of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004