Legal Opinion
Hayes v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frederic E. Hammer, J.
Plaintiff moves for an order to compel defendant, the City of New York, to accept service of a summons and complaint nunc pro tunc, or, in the alternative, to estop the City of New York from asserting the Statute of Limitations as a defense.
Plaintiff alleges that on March 1, 1978 she was injured *923when she tripped and fell on a sidewalk in the County of Queens, City of New York. On May 4, 1978 the City of New York was duly served with a notice of claim in compliance with section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Plaintiff was represented by counsel at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gregoire v. G. P. Putnam's SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Cameron Estates, Inc. v. DeeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Robinson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Arnold v. Mayal Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Serravillo v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goyea v. Town of BangorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988